<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Python to parse XML is easier than it should be</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plausibleaccuracy.com/2008/06/24/using-python-to-parse-xml-is-easier-than-it-should-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plausibleaccuracy.com/2008/06/24/using-python-to-parse-xml-is-easier-than-it-should-be/</link>
	<description>If you find anything truly accurate, please alert us</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: zack</title>
		<link>http://www.plausibleaccuracy.com/2008/06/24/using-python-to-parse-xml-is-easier-than-it-should-be/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plausibleaccuracy.com/?p=135#comment-560</guid>
		<description>ElementTree is pretty hot stuff. If you really want to be impressed with a Python module that can handle almost anything you throw at it, have a look at Mark Pilgrim's fabulous Universal Feedparser. http://feedparser.org/

If you are doing any work with RSS/Atom/etc. this is a life saver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ElementTree is pretty hot stuff. If you really want to be impressed with a Python module that can handle almost anything you throw at it, have a look at Mark Pilgrim&#8217;s fabulous Universal Feedparser. <a href="http://feedparser.org/" rel="nofollow">http://feedparser.org/</a></p>
<p>If you are doing any work with RSS/Atom/etc. this is a life saver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.208 seconds -->
